First this – seen on the bbc website:

Welsh translation: “I am not in the office at the moment. Send any work to be translated.”
And now this, posted here:

I was about to add some commentary. But it’s really not necessary is it. Sigh.
First this – seen on the bbc website:

Welsh translation: “I am not in the office at the moment. Send any work to be translated.”
And now this, posted here:

I was about to add some commentary. But it’s really not necessary is it. Sigh.
First Nike did it. Now Havianas. Both brands have asked people to click ‘like’ button in order to get something. It feels quite dirty to me.

Nike asked users to click ‘like’ to see their ad. For me, they just got away with it, because I did like it. But it’s still dirty. And in fact you were clicking to ‘like’ Nike Football, not the ad at all. Hmm. The Havianas example isn’t quite as bad in comparison.
But would I complain if a brand said ‘wear this badge saying you like us and we’ll give you 20% off’? Probably not. What if they said ‘shout that you like us or you can’t come in our shop’? I’d probably punch them, right in the face.
‘Like’ culture is still in its embryonic stage, so I guess it’s going to get a bit abused while people work out the etiquette. I’m also British, so it doesn’t take much to make me frown about things ;)
Does like-bribing annoy anyone else? Shall I shut up?
Like you (probably) I take photos on my phone when I , you know, see interesting things. Then I forget they exist and subsequently forget to share the observation. Tragic, I know.
Anyway, today is a rare sync-my-phone-with-my-computer today and low and behold, a small cluster of forgotten observations has appeared before me. Here they are. [I think this is the blogging equivalent of cooking with whatever ingredients you happen to find in the fridge]
An interesting example of streamlining here. It seems golf-sale-signs have been deemed a waste of wood. Or maybe it’s just tiring holding them all day. This chap on Regents Street in Central London IS the sign. A bit sad, somehow.
Everyone in London seems to be riding one of these. I think this photo at Poke nicely captures the cementing of their ubiquity. It’s funny how visual repetition like this immediately creates the sense of a ‘culture’ of behaviour. A bit like how designers consider logo designs. Only when they’re repeated together does the mark feel like a ‘mark’.
I went to a talk by Happy Finish about comping CG elements with photography. The talk itself was held in the very space that the image/scene being discussed was created; a large industrial space in East London. Rather than just explain that they used a smoke machine, they switched it on. This was the view from my seat as I listened. A small bit of theatre goes a long way.
Someone at Currells Estate Agents decided that buying the ad space on the bus stop directly outside their office was a good idea. Fine in theory, but the result is pointless in many ways. The ad creates absolutely no extra visibility for the company as it simply sits in front of a much bigger ad – the office itself. Looks like it was all just to make a pun about the bus stop. Even more ridiculous seeing as no one on the bus could possibly read it.
Culturally contextual, that it. A cheeky reactive ad from airline, BMI taking a jab at BA ahead of its strikes.
The Troubadour‘s menu reminds me of a page from the Yellow Pages. It looks like each section has been designed in isolation from the last. It’s not ‘good’ design, but that’s sort of what I like about it. I’m a bit bored of minimalism and deliberate under-design (plain menus with courier typeface etc). I like that this menu feels a little eccentric and unselfconscious.
The East London line opened fairly recently. Between the Hoxton and Shoreditch stops, the train swerves around the building we work in. I don’t know about you, but when I’m given a fresh view of a familiar place, it thrills me a little. I think because it’s kind of a metaphor for what I enjoy doing in my job as a strategist. If you’re interested at all, here’s a brand new view of the Tea and Biscuit buildings as we travel across the 300 tonne bridge that was erected last year.
I almost walked into the Ladies’ by mistake. It was quite dark in the corridor and at first glance the symbol looked like a man. Upon closer inspection I realised the pictograms were more anatomical than expected.
I crudely articulated my Creative Strategist role as ‘ideas with purpose’ in a presentation recently. Aside from being a bit wanky and vacuous, it was sort of fine in the circumstances: a quick slide that I elaborated on verbally. Then I saw someone tweet it out of context and I felt a bit sick. It’s an awful, unsatisfactory collection of words. So I think I owe it to myself to do better.
So what is a Creative Strategist?
The first thing to say is that it’s probably lots of different things to different people/agencies. It’s one of many hybrid roles that have popped up to help re-package those of us who don’t fit into the old boxes. With that in mind, the term is simply a transient vehicle to help explain something that is certain to change again.
Anyway, for me, now, these two pictures kind of sum it up:

It will be interesting to see if I still agree with the above in a few months time. Or tomorrow ;)
I recently put together this presentation for the IED and APG in Madrid. I make all my excuses in the first few slides ;) so I won’t repeat them here. I hope you get something out of it.
I was watching some Russell Howard stand-up the other night. He was sharing a theory that before the internet offered people anonymous ways to vent their anger at the world, people probably fastened messages of hate to pigeons and sent them off into the sky. Yes, probably.
It reminded me of the Romans’ ‘curse tablets’, which I learned about in Bath a few weeks ago. The Romans used to write curses (“The thief who stole this, may you consume his blood and take it away”) on square sheets of lead/pewter and deposit them in places where ‘only the Gods would see them’. Below is just such a curse tablet, found in the reservoir of the Roman Baths.

It’s a bit like tying it to a pigeon or shouting it in the comments section of a blog under ‘guest’.
“After writing the tablet was folded or rolled and the ends of the sheet were tucked over, making the document legible to the god alone.”
People seem to like the presentation I uploaded the other day. So here’s another one I did at the same time. It’s about getting people to participate in a rich conversation through a simple action:
I know, this is a very lazy way to blog. Sorry.
What does it mean to understand something?
I become more certain by the day, that the true test of understanding something is the ability to communicate it to others. Just because you ‘get it’ in a sort of abstract, internal way doesn’t mean you understand it. This is why some of the smartest bloggers are the eloquent ones. It’s not what they know, it’s how they disseminate the information that sets them apart. And arguably it’s this dissemination that truly defines their understanding.
It got me thinking about the Einstein quote “If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough.” Which got me thinking about Noah – who has been known to cite the quotation. Noah recently put together an excellent presentation considering what innovation actually meant. Read it here. I will crudely paraphrase and say that the broad conclusion was that invention is the creation of a new idea, but innovation is bringing it to market. I.e. Innovation is the ability to realise an invention through its adoption by others.
Which brings me back to ‘understanding’. I think that ‘explaining’ is to understanding what innovation is to invention. Forget what you know – it is only of limited use. Real smartness is the ability to – as my old creative writing tutor called it – “infect” others with your idea.
I ‘understand’ this. I hope I’ve managed to explain it ;)
Whipcar is an interesting new service where members can rent cars off other normal folk.
As the Economist says, “pooling assets, it seems, is all the rage” and I’m all for this kind of thing. I might even try it as an alternative to Streetcar. Oh, but if your first question was the same one I had, the answer is:
“WhipCar will not be responsible for incidents caused by rentals.”
Update: Or at least I thought it was. But their co-founder comments below: “by booking a car through WhipCar our partners will automatically insure you for the period of hire. Our fully comprehensive insurance policy replaces an owner’s existing policy for the duration of hire and includes cover for loss or damage up to £10,000,000.”
There’s a similar service in Boston called RelayRides. They provide…
“…a supplemental insurance policy to cover the rental period. However, there is a $500 deductible, so you will be responsible for paying the first $500 of any damages.”
Yes, ok the title makes you want to punch me in the face. That’s cool.
Below is one of four presentations I gave in Madrid a couple of weeks ago. Hopefully the title will annoy you less as you read on. Maybe not. Either way, this is the story of how my background in PR and WOM marketing helped shape my attitude and interests concerning digital. Only I’m not interested in ‘digital’. I’m interested in meaningful – and where possible ‘real’ – ideas. Anyway.